Perspectiva holística de las aguas residuales de los mataderos desde el contexto de la PENTAhélice: una revisión de alcance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2026-06-06Keywords:
estudio bibliográfico, agua residual, industria alimentaria, carne, universidad, gobierno, industria, medio ambiente, sociedad, PRISMA-ScRAbstract
La disposición indiscriminada de las aguas residuales de los mataderos genera afecciones. Esta revisión de alcance tiene el objetivo de identificar el interés y las implicaciones de los actores de la PENTAhélice —empresa, academia, gobierno, sociedad y medio ambiente— en la gestión de las aguas residuales de los mataderos. PRISMA-ScR se utilizó para recabar y analizar estudios durante 2020-2024. Se identificó que los actores explícitos son la academia, el gobierno y la industria con una participación del 76.92, 15.39 y 7.69 %, respectivamente; mientras que la sociedad y medio ambiente son actores implícitos que son considerados por los explícitos. Los profesores y alumnos generan y aplican conocimiento que mediante el financiamiento del gobierno puede desarrollar estrategias de gestión a nivel laboratorio y divulgar los resultados; al vincularse con el sector privado, estos resultados pueden potencializarse en desarrollos tecnológicos, con el respaldo en el cumplimiento de la normatividad que enmarca el gobierno. El medio ambiente es un actor integrado por la academia, industria y gobierno, como beneficiario de las estrategias que remueven parámetros fisicoquímicos que lo afectan. La sociedad no evidencia una presencia directa, sino su intervención deriva de la intención de la academia por atender el riesgo en la salud humana. Finalmente, la colaboración integral entre los actores es fundamental en el desarrollo de estrategias sustentables multidisciplinarias y transdisciplinarias entre los actores de la PENTAhélice en beneficio de la humanidad y del medio ambiente.
References
Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437, 140527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527
Adou, K. E., Kouakou, A. R., Ehouman, A. D., Tyagi, R. D., Drogui, P., & Adouby, K. (2022). Coupling anaerobic digestion process and electrocoagulation using iron and aluminium electrodes for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Scientific African, 16, e01238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01238
Aguinis, H., Yu, L., & Tosun, C. (2021). How to enhance scholarly impact: recommendations for university administrators, researchers and educators. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(8), 2485-2499. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2020-1189
Alfonso-Muniozguren, P., Gomes, A. I., Saroj, D., Vilar, V. J. P., & Lee, J. (2021). The role of ozone combined with UVC/H2O2 process for the tertiary treatment of a real slaughterhouse wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 289, 112480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112480
Anthony, B. (2024). The role of community engagement in urban innovation towards the co-creation of smart sustainable cities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1592-1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01176-1
Azam, R., Kothari, R., Singh, H. M., Ahmad, S., Ashokkumar, V., & Tyagi, V. V. (2020). Production of algal biomass for its biochemical profile using slaughterhouse wastewater for treatment under axenic conditions. Bioresource Technology, 306, 123116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123116
Aziz, A., Basheer, F., Sengar, A., Irfanullah, Khan, S. U., & Farooqi, I. H. (2019). Biological wastewater treatment (anaerobic-aerobic) technologies for safe discharge of treated slaughterhouse and meat processing wastewater. Science of the Total Environment, 686, 681-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.295
Bazrafshan, E., Zakeri, H. R., Vieira, M. G. A., Derakhshan, Z., Mohammadi, L., Mohammadpour, A., & Mousavi Khaneghah, A. (2022). Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by integrated chemical coagulation and electro-Fenton processes. Sustainability, 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811407
Bingo, M. N., Njoya, M., Basitere, M., Ntwampe, S. K. O., & Kaskote, E. (2021). Performance evaluation of an integrated multi-stage poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment system. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 43, 102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102309
Budi, N. F. A., Fitriani, W. R., Hidayanto, A. N., Kurnia, S., & Inan, D. I. (2020). A study of government 2.0 implementation in Indonesia. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100920
Clarivate. (2024, December 23). Web of Science. https://www.webofscience.com/
COFEPRIS, Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios. (2006). Evaluación de riesgos de los rastros y mataderos municipales. https://www.gob.mx/cofepris/documentos/evaluacion-de-riesgos-de-los-rastros-y-mataderos-municipales
Crainic, R., & Fechete, R. (2024). Slaughterhouse wastewater properties assessment by modern and classic methods. Water, 16(17), 2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172382
De Jong, S., & Del Junco, C. (2024). How do professional staff influence academic knowledge development? A literature review and research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 49(6), 1042-1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2258155
De Nardi, I. R., Fuzi, T. P., & Del Nery, V. (2008). Performance evaluation and operating strategies of dissolved-air flotation system treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(3), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.06.005
Derakhshan, A., Rezaei-Kalantari, R., Farzadkia, M., Tiyuri, A., & Esrafili, A. (2023). The effect of biological treatment methods on the concentration of carbonaceous pollutants in the slaughterhouse wastewater: A systematic review. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 8, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100451
Dos Santos-Pereira, A. K., Teixeira, K. C., Pereira, D. H., & Cavallini, G. S. (2024). A critical review on slaughterhouse wastewater: Treatment methods and reuse possibilities. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 58, 104819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.104819
Dosta, J., Rovira, J., Galí, A., Macé, S., & Mata-Álvarez, J. (2008). Integration of a coagulation/flocculation step in a biological sequencing batch reactor for COD and nitrogen removal of supernatant of anaerobically digested piggery wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), 5722-5730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.021
Dyosile, P. A., Mdladla, C., Njoya, M., Basitere, M., Ntwampe, S. K. O., & Kaskote, E. (2021). Assessment of an integrated and sustainable multistage system for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Membranes, 11(8), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080582
Elkady, M., Yosri, Ahmed, M., Fathy, S. M., & Abbas, M. H. A. (2024). Slaughterhouse wastewater remediation using carbonized sawdust followed by textile filtration. Applied Water Science, 14(12), 246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02312-1
Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430
Elsevier Ltd. (2024). Mendeley Cite (v1.67.0). Elsevier Ltd. https://www.mendeley.com/reference-management/mendeley-cite
Elsevier. (2024a, December 23). ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/
Elsevier. (2024b, December 23). Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/
Evans, J. A. (2010a). Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 757-791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710379931
Evans, J. A. (2010b). Industry induces academic science to know less about more. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 389-452. https://doi.org/10.1086/653834
Fedorov, K., Rayaroth, M. P., Shah, N. S., & Boczkaj, G. (2023). Activated sodium percarbonate-ozone (SPC/O3) hybrid hydrodynamic cavitation system for advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) of 1,4-dioxane in water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 456, 141027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.141027
Feng, H., Hu, L., Mahmood, Q., Fang, C., Qiu, C., & Shen, D. (2009). Effects of temperature and feed strength on a carrier anaerobic baffled reactor treating dilute wastewater. Desalination, 239(1-3), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.011
Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37(1), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.011
Gómez, W. (2023). Assessing PrEP messaging and communication: A review of the qualitative literature. Current Opinion in Psychology, 51, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101586
Google. (2024, December 23). Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/
Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00107
Hellal, M. S., El-Kamah, H. M., & Doma, H. S. (2024). High-performance internal circulation anaerobic granular sludge reactor for cattle slaughterhouse wastewater treatment and simultaneous biogas production. BMC Biotechnology, 24(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-024-00849-2
Hutchinson, J. R., & Huberman, M. (1994). Knowledge dissemination and use in science and mathematics education: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575814
INAP, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. (2019). Guía técnica 21. La administración de rastros municipales. Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. https://biblio.juridicas.unam.mx/bjv/id/1717
Iqbal, J., Shah, N. S., Sayed, M., Khan, J. A., Imran, M., Khan, Z. U. H., Niazi, N. K., Al-Taani, A. A., Howari, F., & Nazzal, Y. (2021). Exploring the potential of nano-zerovalent copper modified biochar for the removal of ciprofloxacin from water. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 16, 100604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100604
Jan van Eck, N., Waltman, L., & Leiden University’s Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). (2023). VOSviewer (1.6.20). Centre for Science and Technology Studies. https://www.vosviewer.com/
Kanafin, Y. N., Makhatova, A., Meiramkulova, K., & Poulopoulos, S. G. (2022). Treatment of a poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using advanced oxidation processes. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 47, 102694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102694
Kothari, R., Azam, R., Bharti, A., Goria, K., Allen, T., Ashokkumar, V., Pathania, D., Singh, R. P., & Tyagi, V. V. (2024). Biobased treatment and resource recovery from slaughterhouse wastewater via reutilization and recycling for sustainable waste approach. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 58, 104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104712
Luna-Nemecio, J., Tobón, S., & Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Sustainability-based on socioformation and complex thought or sustainable social development. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 2, 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2020.100007
Madeira, L., Ribau-Teixeira, M., Almeida, A., Santos, T., & Carvalho, F. (2023). Reuse of lime sludge from immediate one-step lime precipitation process as a coagulant (aid) in slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118278
Mak, S., & Thomas, A. (2022). Steps for conducting a scoping review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(5), 565-567. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-22-00621.1
Marín-Peña, O., Alvarado-Lassman, A., Alvarado-Vallejo, A., Sandoval-Herazo, M., Hernández-Castelán, D. A., Zamora-Castro, S. A., & Sandoval-Herazo, L. C. (2024). Evaluation of a pilot-scale anaerobic biofilm reactor for the treatment of slaughterhouse effluents in rural areas. Water Practice and Technology, 19(9), 3706-3720. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.234
McGowan, J., Sampson, M., Salzwedel, D. M., Cogo, E., Foerster, V., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). Press Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 75, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2016.01.021
McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053
Meerts, C. (2020). Corporate investigations: Beyond notions of public–private relations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 36(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986219890202
Meerts, C. A. (2018). The organisation as the cure for its own ailments: Corporate investigators in The Netherlands. Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030025
Meiramkulova, K., Temirbekova, A., Saspugayeva, G., Kydyrbekova, A., Devrishov, D., Tulegenova, Z., Aubakirova, K., Kovalchuk, N., Meirbekov, A., & Mkilima, T. (2021). Performance of a combined treatment approach on the elimination of microbes from poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Sustainability, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063467
Microsoft Corp. (2024). Microsoft Excel for Microsoft 365 (2411 build 16.0.18227.20082) (sotware). Microsoft Corp.
Mishra, B. K., Kumar, P., Saraswat, C., Chakraborty, S., & Gautam, A. (2021). Water security in a changing environment: Concept, challenges and solutions. Water, 13(4), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040490
Mkilima, T., Saspugayeva, G., Dakieva, K., Tussupova, Z., Zhaken, A., Kumarbekuly, S., Daribay, A., & Khussainov, M. (2024). Enhancing slaughterhouse wastewater treatment through the integration of microbial fuel cell and electro-Fenton systems: A comprehensive comparative analysis. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 57, 104743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104743
Montiel-Rosales, A., Montalvo-Romero, N., Fernández-Echeverría, E., & Ruiz-Hernández, O. (2024). Holistic perspective of slaughterhouse wastewater from the context of the PENTApropeller: A scoping review. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/eu63v/
Paschek, D., Luminosu, C.-T., & Ocakci, E. (2022). Industry 5.0 challenges and perspectives for manufacturing systems in the society 5.0. In: Draghici, A., & Ivascu, L. (eds.). Sustainability and innovation in manufacturing enterprises: Indicators, models and assessment for industry 5.0 (pp. 17-63). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7365-8_2
Prill, R., Karlsson, J., Ayeni, O. R., & Becker, R. (2021). Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29(9), 2739-2744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06631-7
PROFEPA, Procuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente. (2015). LEY GENERAL PARA LA PREVENCIÓN Y GESTIÓN INTEGRAL DE LOS RESIDUOS. https://www.gob.mx/profepa/documentos/ley-general-para-la-prevencion-y-gestion-integral-de-los-residuos-62914
Quiroga, G., García-de-Siles, J. L., & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (1994). Manual para la instalación del pequeño matadero modular de la FAO (núm. 120). Estudio FAO: Producción y Sanidad Animal.
Raihan, A., Ridwan, M., & Rahman, M. S. (2024). An exploration of the latest developments, obstacles, and potential future pathways for climate-smart agriculture. Climate Smart Agriculture, 1(2), 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csag.2024.100020
Rajpal, A., Ali, M., Choudhury, M., Almohana, A. I., Alali, A. F., Munshi, F. M. A., Khursheed, A., & Kazmi, A. A. (2022). Abattoir wastewater treatment plants in India: Understanding and performance evaluation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.881623
Ramadan, L., Deeb, R., Sawaya, C., El Khoury, C., Wazne, M., & Harb, M. (2023). Anaerobic membrane bioreactor-based treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater: Microbial community adaptation and antibiotic resistance gene profiles. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 192, 108847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2023.108847
Ramírez-Montoya, L. A., Valenzuela, E. I., De Velasco-Maldonado, P. S., Hernández-Montoya, V., Menéndez, J. A., Montes-Morán, M. A., & Cervantes, F. J. (2023). Carbon-based materials boost the anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 56, 104553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104553
Sandoval, M. A., & Salazar, R. (2021). Electrochemical treatment of slaughterhouse and dairy wastewater: Toward making a sustainable process. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, 26, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2020.100662
Sandoval, M. A., Coreño, O., García, V., & Salazar-González, R. (2024). Enhancing industrial swine slaughterhouse wastewater treatment: Optimization of electrocoagulation technique and operating mode. Journal of Environmental Management, 349, 119556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119556
Savin, M., Bierbaum, G., Hammerl, J. A., Heinemann, C., Parcina, M., Sib, E., Voigt, A., & Kreyenschmidt, J. (2020). Antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antimicrobial residues in wastewater and process water from German pig slaughterhouses and their receiving municipal wastewater treatment plants. Science of the Total Environment, 727, 138788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138788
Scholz, R. W. (2020). Transdisciplinarity: Science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1033-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00794-x
Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. (2023). Capacidad instalada para el sacrificio de especies pecuarias. https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/dgsiap/documentos/capacidad-de-sacrificio-de-especies-pecuarias
Secretaría de Salud. (2004). Productos y Servicios. Especificaciones sanitarias en los establecimientos dedicados al sacrificio y faenado de animales para abasto, almacenamiento, transporte y expendio. Especificaciones sanitarias de productos (NOM-194-SSA1-2004). https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=661587&fecha=18/09/2004#gsc.tab=0
Shende, A. D., Dhenkula, S., Rao, N. N., & Pophali, G. R. (2022). An improved primary wastewater treatment system for a slaughterhouse industry: A full-scale experience. Water Science and Technology, 85(5), 1688-1700. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.041
Shi, Z., Tan, X., Li, Y., Sheng, Y., Zhang, Q., Xu, J., & Yang, Y. (2023). A novel fungal-algal coupling system for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment and lipid production. Bioresource Technology, 387, 129585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129585
SpringerNature. (2024, December 23). SpringerLink. https://rd.springer.com/
Teo, C. J., Karkou, E., Vlad, O., Vyrkou, A., Savvakis, N., Arampatzis, G., & Angelis-Dimakis, A. (2023). Life cycle environmental impact assessment of slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 200, 550-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.11.016
Terán-Hilares, R., Garcia-Bustos, K. A., Sanchez-Vera, F. P., Colina-Andrade, G. J., & Pacheco-Tanaka, D. A. (2021). Acid precipitation followed by microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris) cultivation as a new approach for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 335, 125284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125284
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2004). Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Research Policy, 33(5), 709-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.002
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C.,… & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023). The drivers of environmental sustainability in BRICS economies: Do green finance and fintech matter? World Development Sustainability, 3, 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100096
Upreti, G. (2023). Ecosociocentrism: The Earth first paradigm for sustainable living. In: Ecosociocentrism: The Earth first paradigm for sustainable living (pp. 307-367). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41754-2_13
Vilkins, S., & Grant, W. J. (2017). Types of evidence cited in Australian Government publications. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1681-1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2544-2
Villar, A. S., & Khan, N. (2021). Robotic process automation in banking industry: A case study on Deutsche Bank. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 5(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42786-021-00030-9
Wirba, A. V. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The role of government in promoting CSR. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 7428-7454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01185-0
Yang, R., Wu, Q., & Xie, Y. (2023). Are scientific articles involving corporations associated with higher citations and views? An analysis of the top journals in business research. Scientometrics, 128(10), 5659-5685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04808-0
Zahedi, S., Gros, M., Balcazar, J. L., Petrovic, M., & Pijuan, M. (2021). Assessing the occurrence of pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance genes during the anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater at different temperatures. Science of the Total Environment, 789, 147910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147910
Zhanbayev, R. A., Irfan, M., Shutaleva, A. V, Maksimov, D. G., Abdykadyrkyzy, R., & Filiz, Ş. (2023). Demoethical model of sustainable development of society: A roadmap towards digital transformation. Sustainability, 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612478
Zorpas, A. A. (2024). The hidden concept and the beauty of multiple "R" in the framework of waste strategies development reflecting to circular economy principles. Science of the Total Environment, 952, 175508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175508
Zuccolotto, R., Riccio, E. L., & Sakata, M. C. G. (2014). Characteristics of scientific production on governmental transparency. International Journal of Auditing Technology, 2(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijaudit.2014.066234
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tecnología y ciencias del agua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://www.revistatyca.org.mx/. Permissions beyond what is covered by this license can be found in Editorial Policy.
